A number of unions and global union federations have written to the International Labour Organization (ILO — part of the UN) asking it to urgently intervene on behalf of the 800 seafarers who were illegally fired and cruelly mistreated by P&O Ferries.
The unions argue that the UK government’s failure to enforce relevant labour laws and punitive sanctions to ensure compliance following P&O Ferries’ illegal firing of seafarers without consultation, is a serious violation of the ILO’s principles concerning the freedom of association and collective bargaining. The government has also contravened international treaties the UK is bound by.
P&O Ferries’ assault on the legal framework triggered workers’ organisations including International Transport Workers’ Federation (ITF), seafarers’ unions Nautilus International and the Rail, Maritime and Transport Workers (RMT); the UK Trades Union Congress (TUC); the European Transport Workers’ Federation (ETF), and the International Trade Union Confederation (ITUC) to jointly file an official complaint with the ILO about the UK Government.
They consider the matter so serious that they have also requested the urgent personal intervention of ILO Director General Guy Ryder, asking him to point out to the UK its failure to abide by internationally recognised labour standards.
“P&O Ferries’ CEO has admitted the company behaved illegally when it fired 800 seafarers without warning in March, and he has told parliament he would do the same again,” said Stephen Cotton, General Secretary of the ITF. “P&O Ferries has behaved in the most calculated and egregious way and expects to get away with it.”
Laws let companies buy their way out of trouble, workers left with few options
“P&O Ferries has run roughshod over these workers’ right to freedom of association and to collective bargaining,” said Cotton. “That’s the consequence of this company blatantly ignoring their legal requirement to consult with the seafarers and their unions, before it sacked them en-masse over Zoom, escorted them off the ships with handcuff-trained security guards and replaced them with a non-unionised workforce on just a fraction of the pay.”
Cotton said unions were concerned that under UK law workers could be financially pressured to sign away their rights to legally challenge an employers’ lawbreaking.
“P&O Ferries ‘priced in’ breaking the law and then set about blackmailing the seafarers with gag-order packages worth more than if the workers took P&O to court and won a statutory settlement, buying their legal silence and snuffing out their rights.”
Cotton said that although P&O’s actions were unethical, there were few routes for unions to challenge the actions under current UK law.
“Through the ILO, we’re demanding that the UK strengthens their employment laws so that workers can actually rely on the rights the government says they have,” said Cotton.
“There needs to be a genuine deterrent to rogue employers. We want to see directors being disbarred if they wilfully ignore workers’ right to consultation. There shouldn’t be a cap on the compensation a worker can receive for an employer failing to consult. It needs to be removed so that courts can apply penalties that fit the crime in cases like P&O Ferries’ which is fire and rehire on steroids.”
Cotton said the UK Government needed to allow unions and workers to seek injunctive relief from courts which could pause controversial firings and even reverse sackings until an employer conducts the proper consultation.”
Until the UK makes these changes to its laws, the country is in violation of ILO Conventions 87 and 98. ILO C98 obliges the country to ‘encourage and promote’ collective bargaining machinery, stipulating that all ‘workers shall enjoy adequate protection against acts of anti-union discrimination’.
Unions speak out
RMT general secretary Mick Lynch said: "Gangster capitalists like P&O Ferries are trashing the law and maritime safety standards in order to make a quick buck. This cannot be tolerated. Employers like P&O Ferries, hell-bent on attacking workers rights to profit their owners in Dubai, must face effective legal consequences at the ILO level.”
Nautilus International general secretary Mark Dickinson, said: “Fifty days into this self-imposed crisis, P&O Ferries CEO Peter Hebblethwaite, who admitted to breaking the law, has not paid any price for the illegal sacking of our members. He’s got to go.”
The ETF General Secretary, Livia Spera, said: “The UK Government’s failure to enforce their labour laws sets a dangerous precedent for rogue employers across Europe. Ministers must step in, clean up this mess, so we never see another workers’ life ripped apart by such callous and calculated industrial relations practices.”
Frances O'Grady, TUC General Secretary, said: “Nobody should be treated like disposable labour. But our worker protections are so weak that employers with deep pockets can simply bypass them.”
“This national scandal should be a turning point for workers' rights in the UK. But Boris Johnson has failed to deliver his long-promised employment bill to strengthen workers’ rights. Working people have had enough. They need better protection and greater dignity at work. And rogue employers who break the law must be hit by tougher penalties and higher fines than the current laws allow.”
Sharan Burrow, General Secretary of the ITUC, said: “Decent jobs, freedom of association and collective bargaining must be at the heart of employment laws. Labour laws must protect workers. Now is the time for the UK Government to stamp out fire and rehire, bolster their laws and enforce heavy sanctions on companies who fail to comply.”
Notes for editors:
Changes to the law unions want to see
- Allow unions to apply for an injunction to prohibit illegal dismissals from taking effect, or to reinstate workers, until full and meaningful consultation has been carried out
- Introduce legislation to establish sector-wide collective bargaining between unions and employers in respect of all ferries serving ports in the UK and make collective agreements binding by law (as under the Wages Councils Act 1976)
- Remove the prohibition on secondary industrial action where the employer in dispute has failed to fulfill a statutory obligation to consult the recognised union
- Make it a criminal offence for a company and its directors to fail to consult the unions, punishable by unlimited fines
- Remove the limit on compensation for failure to consult (it is currently capped at 90 days contractual pay)
- Amend the TUPE Regulations 2006 to allow the unions to apply for an injunction for the transfer proceedings to be stopped until full and meaningful consultation has been carried out;
- Amend the Employment Rights Act 1996, to ban the ‘fire and rehire’ techniques that P&O Ferries used
- Implement stronger, flag-blind legislation protecting all seafarers from all forms of discrimination (allowing the UK authorities more scope to intervene even is a ship is registered elsewhere)
- Amend the Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986 to make failure to consult grounds for disqualification as a company director