Print this page   Print this page

Will Rotterdam be next to turn its back on safety?

Opciones de lectura | Cambio de idioma | Pasar directamente a navegación

Contexto de página: Página principal > Revista 'Transporte Internacional' > Issue 18 January 2005Cargo in the Wrong Hands > Will Rotterdam be next to turn its back on safety?


ITF translations available: Deutsch, Français, Español, Svenska
Google free translation service: Français, Español, Svenska, Nederlands, Italiano, Português, العربية, 中文, Polski, Русский, 日本語, 한국어 [韓國語], Български, فارسی - About these links


by Frank Leys

Rotterdam in the Netherlands has joined the growing list of ports worldwide now allowing or planning to allow the crews of visiting ships to lash and secure containers. The authorities are willing to regulate some lashing by the traditional lashing gangs of dockers. However this exception will apply only to container vessels - an intriguing stipulation since these are the vessels with larger, less over-stretched crews.

We at the ITF remain convinced that all lashing and securing of cargo should be done by shore based, registered and well trained lashing gangs.

Seafarers in general, and in particular those on smaller vessels - plying short sea routes with more limited crews, and fewer, shorter rest periods - are subject to fatigue. They are taking on an increasing number of tasks in order to guarantee the commercial exploitation of the vessel. Faster turnaround times and new security restrictions have limited their access to shore leave and the welfare facilities provided for seafarers in the ports. At the same time there are a growing number of duties, both physical and administrative, related to the safety of the ship. 

Yet fatigue itself is a serious safety issue. Vessels should be sufficiently manned to avoid the need for crews to work excessive hours.

Once in port, a ship's crew might have to deal with port authorities, customs officers, immigration officers, the flag state surveyor, the class surveyor, port state control, the ship chandler (person selling provisions to the ship) and so on.  The 2004 International Ship and Port Facility Security (ISPS) code makes officers and crew responsible for ensuring that the ship complies with security in port, for which different watches at the gangway have to be maintained.

There is a special European directive  (Directive 1999/95/EC ) governing the working hours of seafarers on board ships calling at EU ports. Yet now, on top of the daunting list of tasks outlined above, it is argued that seafarers calling at Rotterdam should be lashing and securing containers. We strongly oppose this point of view, which will compromise maritime safety by putting commercial interests first.

 

Frank Leys is the ITF Dockers' Section Secretary



Página inicial:
Issue 18 January 2005

Otras páginas para Issue 18 January 2005:
Economics of HIV | Presumed Guilty | Bus Driver Blues | Picket Notebook | New Pollution Charge | Keeping Going | The Global Reporting Initiative | Commentary: Let them ashore | Commentary: Low cost at any price | Comment: frontlines in US | In a Man's World | Working Life: Our struggles with Maersk | Reflections: Readers thoughts on HIV/AIDS

Otras páginas para Cargo in the Wrong Hands:

ITF Página principal | Revista 'Transporte Internacional' | Último número | Números anteriores | Sobre Transporte Internacional | Distribución | Requisitar ejemplares | Consejo Editorial


Edición texto con gráficos

accesibilidad | ayuda | mapa del sitio

La Revista de la Federación Internacional de los Trabajadores del Transporte

© ITF 2004 Reservados todos los derechos

ITF House, 49-60 Borough Road, London SE1 1DR | +44 20 7403 2733 | mail@itf.org.uk