Privatisation of the Uganda and Kenya railways corporations

Change low graphic options | Change language | Skip content to navigation

Page context: HomeRailwaysRailway Union Reports > Issue 2 - March 2008


Uganda Railway Workers’ Union

The political situation in Uganda

Uganda is a landlocked country situated in East Africa, with an area of 93,000 sq miles and a population of about 29 million. The current government has improved the political, economic and social aspects of the majority of citizens. Economic activities, schools and banks, which were in the past confined within urban areas, have now penetrated rural areas.

Uganda has ratified a number of ILO conventions, notably Conventions No. 11, 29, 87, 98, 100, 105, 111, 122, 138, 144, 154, 158 and 182, all of which have been incorporated into the national constitution. Following tripartite consultations, Parliament enacted several labour laws, such as: the labour unions act 2006, the employment act 2006, the labour disputes (arbitration and settlement) act 2006, the occupational safety and health act 2006.

Ratification of important ILO conventions, new labour laws, and workers’ right to have five representatives in parliament have marked a significant step forward from the old provisions, which had prevented workers from organising and joining trade unions.

Uganda and Kenya railways privatisation process

Poised to allow foreign investments and greater participation of the private sector in the economy, the Ugandan government embarked on a reform program by enacting privatisation guidelines under the public enterprise reform and divesture (PERD) statute No 9 of 1993.

Parliament approved in 2001 the strategy to concession Uganda Railway Corporation (URC).

Following the 2003 agreement of the presidents of Uganda and Kenya to concession the two national railway corporations together, the two governments set up a joint steering committee to overview the implementation of the whole process.

Having realised that privatisation could lead to unemployment, the Uganda Railway Workers’ Union (URWU) and Kenya Railway Workers’ Union (KRWU) tried to resist the concession, but the governments’ decisions eventually prevailed.

Both unions demanded their participation in negotiations, particularly they demanded:

However, despite having consulted one another, the unions negotiated separately with their governments and corporations.

Railway workers in Uganda went on strike twice, the second strike lasting for two weeks (31 March – 13 April 2005). URWU reported the case to the ministry of gender, labour and social development, and following a tripartite meeting involving URWU, the government and the URC, a memorandum of understanding was signed on 13 April 2005 to call off the strike and start negotiations with the government.

Results of negotiations

Negotiations started on 14 April 2005 and ended on 18 April 2006 when the court ruled in workers’ favour. URWU recorded significant achievements:

Conclusion of the concession process

The Rift Valley Railways Consortium (RVRC)is led by South African company Sheltam Trade Close (61 percent), whilst Comazar (10 percent) and the CDIO Institute for Africa Development Trust (four percent) both of South Africa, Kenya’s Prime Fuels (15 percent), Mirambo Holdings of Tanzania (10 percent) are minor partners.

In October 2005, the Rift Valley Railway Consortium won the bid to operate both Uganda and Kenya Railways Corporations for 25 years. URWU filed a suit in the High Court of Kampala and won a court injunction against URC, therefore restraining it from signing the concession agreement. This action compelled the government in Uganda and URC management to resolve all outstanding contentious issues with the union first.

The Uganda government eventually signed a concession agreement with Rift Valley Railways Ltd in April 2006 and a takeover agreement in October 2006.

Information available from Kenya indicates that Kenya Railway Workers’ Union was apparently not fully involved in the negotiation and concession process. A recent report from the union’s general secretary showed that:

The Rift Valley Railways Ltd retained only 605 workers as permanent staff and 300 as casual staff (with negotiations underway to confirm them as permanent) from Uganda, and 3,200 permanent workers and very few casuals from Kenya.

The negative impact of the concession

The concession of Uganda and Kenya Railways Corporations affected a number of trade unions and workers’ rights and created several problems for the two unions:

The positive impact of the concession

Rift Valley Railways Ltd initiated a number of positive actions:

 Strategies to consolidate the unions

  • Uganda Railway Workers' Union and Kenya Railway Workers' Union should consolidate and work together in order to exert considerable pressure on Rift Valley Railway Ltd.
  • As a long-term solution, unions are considering forming
    a sole financially powerful union.
  • Unions should use their existing structures and all available means to attract more workers.  Both unions are planning to use the ITF and their national centres to talk to workers.
  • URWU is training its branch officials and shop stewards with the national centre's support.  This will equip union officials with the necessary skills to effectively serve the workers' interests.
  • Both unions are planning to expand their membership
    by recruiting casual workers from the railway system
    and by organising workers in the transport industry.
  • Unions should approach the ITF to provide assistance
    for training and recruitment purposes.

Conclusion

Governments worldwide are embracing the privatisation of public enterprises only with a view to reducing subsidies for public services and transport services in particular. In the case of the railways, unions should advocate for economic, political and social policies as well as for collective bargaining aimed at creating new jobs and reducing the unemployment rate.

Unionists should understand that privatisation can be successful and beneficial to workers, who are the backbone of the growing economies, only if there is a level playing field and all stakeholders move in the same direction. Unfortunately, this condition has been rarely experienced and fulfilled in the history of privatisation as employers and governments have not always considered workers as vital partners.

It is now the right time for unions to rise and prove their ability to defend their rights, which have been abused in the name of privatisation.


This is the edited version of the report “Privatisation of Uganda and Kenya Corporations” by Samuel Alfred Wuma, National General Secretary, Uganda Railway Workers’ Union, Uganda which was presented at the ITF Railway Workers’ Section Steering Committee meeting, London, 9-10 May 2007



Related documents:
ITF Rail Union Report Number 2: March 2008 (55kb PDF)

*
top

Section home:
Railways

Other pages for Railways:
About This Section | Priorities | Policies | Railway Newsletter | Women in railways

Other pages for Railway Union Reports:
Issue 11 - Dec 2009 | Issue 10 - Nov/Dec 2008 | Issue 9 - Oct 2008 | Issue 8 - Sep 2008 | Issue 7 - August 2008 | Issue 6 - July 2008 | Issue 5 - June 2008 | Issue 4 - May 2008 | Issue 3 - April 2008 | Issue 1 - Feb 2008 | Archive (1999/2000)

Main Sections:
Home | About us | Solidarity | Flags of Convenience campaign | Seafarers | Dockers | Civil Aviation | Railways | Road transport | Urban Transport | Fisheries | Tourism | Inland Navigation | Women | Education | Young workers

Transport International Magazine


Full graphics version

accessibility | site help | site map

ITF House, 49-60 Borough Road, London SE1 1DR | +44 20 7403 2733 | mail@itf.org.uk